Please take this short, five-minute survey about your experience using the Center for Nanoscale Materials. Your feedback is important to us.
Overall Satisfaction
1. Would you recommend the Center for Nanoscale Materials to colleagues?
Yes
No
Not sure
2. Which of these factored into your decision to conduct research at the Center for Nanoscale Materials? (select all that apply)
Proximity to home and/or work
Proximity to a world-class city like Chicago
A specific tool or capability available to you
Access to a specific researcher at Argonne
Access to other Argonne user facilities
Free access to the facility
Other
Research
3. What was the subject of your use of the facility this year?
Basic Research
Applied Research
Developed a new or improved product, process, or technology
4. How do you intend on communicating the knowledge gained at this facility?
Publish in peer-reviewed open literature
Present findings at professional society meeting
Acquire a patent
Other
Please describe the other ways you plan on communicating your results
5. What benefits did you gain at this facility?(choose all that apply)
Furthered the goals of the Department of Energy
Obtained access to unique capabilities not available elsewhere (e.g., forefront experiments; one-of-a-kind instruments; distinctive materials or services)
Facilitated collaborative interactions (e.g., stimulated new ideas for future experiments; increased multidisciplinary work; enabled a new approach within your discipline)
Trained students (undergraduate, graduate, or postdoctoral associate)
Other benefit(s)
Please describe the other benefits you gained from this facility
Facility/Instruments
6. How satisfied were you with the portion of the year that the facility operates?
5
Very Satisfied
4
Satisfied
3
Neither Satisfied
Nor Dissatisfied
2
Dissatisfied
1
Very Dissatisfied
NA
Not Applicable
Please provide comments on your score of 1 or 2:
7. How satisfied were you with the schedule or service (i.e., was the time or service delivered on schedule and was downtime kept to a minimum)?
5
Very Satisfied
4
Satisfied
3
Neither Satisfied
Nor Dissatisfied
2
Dissatisfied
1
Very Dissatisfied
NA
Not Applicable
Please provide comments on your score of 1 or 2:
8. How satisfied were you with the performance (i.e., was the instrument or service maintained close to specifications)?
5
Very Satisfied
4
Satisfied
3
Neither Satisfied
Nor Dissatisfied
2
Dissatisfied
1
Very Dissatisfied
NA
Not Applicable
Please provide comments on your score of 1 or 2:
9. What would you like this facility to do differently?
10. Are there any areas of the Center for Nanoscale Materials User Program that you found particularly helpful or would like to see expanded?
11. How satisfied were you with the support provided by the facility administrative and operations staff?
5
Very Satisfied
4
Satisfied
3
Neither Satisfied
Nor Dissatisfied
2
Dissatisfied
1
Very Dissatisfied
NA
Not Applicable
Please provide comments on your score of 1 or 2:
12. How satisfied were you with the support provided by the scientific and technical staff?
5
Very Satisfied
4
Satisfied
3
Neither Satisfied
Nor Dissatisfied
2
Dissatisfied
1
Very Dissatisfied
NA
Not Applicable
Please provide comments on your score of 1 or 2:
13. Which individual(s) made your experience at the Center for Nanoscale Materials a positive one? Please let us know who and how.
14. Are the training and safety procedures appropriate?
Yes
No
If not, how would you change them?
Communication
15. How did you hear about the Center for Nanoscale Materials (CNM)? (select all that apply)
CNM staff member
CNM newsletter or email
Conference presentation/booth, symposium, tour or other event
Friend or colleague
News article
Scientific journal article
Social media (e.g., LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, etc.)
Trade publication (e.g., communication from an association you belong to or a trade-specific publication you read, etc.)
Other
What other way did you hear about the CNM?
16. Other comments
Submit